Masthead
One of my photos

Gene mapping

April 25th, 2008 · Posted by Skuds in Technology · 3 Comments

I still don’t know whether to be impressed or a bit scared by today’s article about gene mapping.  I can remember hearing about the Human Genome Project when it started, and even before then when it was being talked about.  Back then it sounded like one of those impossible tasks, or at best something that would take a generation to complete.

When the film Gattaca came out in 1997 the project had been running for seven years with no sign of it finishing (it eventually did come up with results six years later) making the movie seem implausible for two reasons: that sequencing could be done on demand in minutes, and that the results of gene mapping would totally dominate society. Not that any of that detracted from it being a visually stunning film, but back then it seemed about as plausible as Star Wars.
Now that scientists say they have completed a gene mapping in a mere four weeks at a cost of only $100,000 with a trend that could lead to the whole thing taking only two days for a cost of $100 I’m not so sure.  From that to a 15-minute test is only a small step.

In theory this opens the door to all sort of eugenicists’ wet dreams.   Using the results to prevent children being born with certain congenital conditions is the benign possibility, but the darker possibilities are to ‘breed out’ certain characteristics deemed to be unwanted or try to encourage other characteristics.  While I don’t think we are going to produce a government that wants to do that sort of thing I wouldn’t have the same confidence in all the various governments of the world.

That isn’t a reason to stifle the technology of course,  but suddenly all sorts of science fiction plots come to mind - like the time machine or Brave New World with ‘epsilons’ or ‘morlocks’ being created deliberately to provide a slave caste.  Its scary when the fiction of the possible becomes the fiction of the plausible.

I imagine Michael Crichton is already polishing off the first draft of a novel based on an extrapolation of this breakthrough…

Tags:

Spread the word!
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • BlogMemes
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Wikio
  • TwitThis
  • co.mments
  • Fark

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 skud's sister // Apr 25, 2008 at 7:58 pm

    I guess some of the simplest genetic manipulation would come first - choosing gender reliably for example. And while this would be useful for preventing gender specific diseases there will be people who see being female, for example, as almost as bad as a disease. (Although a Bangladeshi friend was very glad that she had the baby girl she was hoping for…)

  • 2 Allan Barker // May 15, 2008 at 5:05 pm

    Hi there,
    Gene mapping and the human Genome project are great, as long as they stay directed towards medical research and developing cures for major diseases. I’m a bit unsure about the “gene shopping” culture to pick the perfect baby. Won’t we all end up as clones of each other?

    Cheers
    Allan Barker

  • 3 Skuds // May 16, 2008 at 12:06 am

    Thats the problem isn’t it? Where do you draw the line between medical conditions and merely ‘undesirable’ characteristics?

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

 

 
Comments Policy:

  • Comments from anyone who is unknown (ie who has not commented before) will go into a moderation queue to be approved. This is to prevent spam/advertising comments and there may be a delay before such comments appear.
  • As far as possible I will not reject moderated comments or delete published comments, even if I disagree with them or if they are criticising me.
  • I intend only to delete/reject comments which are offensive, racist, homophobic, sexist or similar or if they are in any way illegal/libellous.
  • If you think a comment meets those criteria and I might have missed it, let me know.
  • Although technically I am able to edit comments I will not do so unless it is to remove embedded code which is causing problems.
  • If it is ever necessary to edit a comment it will be made clear that it has been edited.
  • Certain words in comments will cause the whole comment to be automatically consigned to the dustbin (Aavaisha, hmmegatest, cognitive, phentermine, xanax, pharmacy, viagra, vicodin, casino, ultram, tamiflu, valium, tramadol, levitra, carisoprodol) for obvious reasons.