<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slowing down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skuds.org/2008/05/slowing-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skuds.org/2008/05/slowing-down/</link>
	<description>&#34;Please send me evenings and weekends&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skuds</title>
		<link>http://skuds.org/2008/05/slowing-down/comment-page-1/#comment-98943</link>
		<dc:creator>Skuds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuds.org/2008/05/slowing-down/#comment-98943</guid>
		<description>Some airlines (and possibly more in the future) impose a surcharge for checking in bags.  isn&#039;t that really a de facto discount for only having hand luggage?

Do people still take liberties with hand luggage?  

When I travelled a lot it seemed like some people had more hand luggage than I had in the hold.  Business travellers were the worst:  they tried to make sure they would not have to wait for hold baggage so took suit carriers and everything on the plane with them.  Whatever rules there were on hand baggage were rarely applied.

Others would have a sports bag or something, but then also have a laptop case, briefcase, carrier bag, duty free bags...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some airlines (and possibly more in the future) impose a surcharge for checking in bags.  isn&#8217;t that really a de facto discount for only having hand luggage?</p>
<p>Do people still take liberties with hand luggage?  </p>
<p>When I travelled a lot it seemed like some people had more hand luggage than I had in the hold.  Business travellers were the worst:  they tried to make sure they would not have to wait for hold baggage so took suit carriers and everything on the plane with them.  Whatever rules there were on hand baggage were rarely applied.</p>
<p>Others would have a sports bag or something, but then also have a laptop case, briefcase, carrier bag, duty free bags&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gert</title>
		<link>http://skuds.org/2008/05/slowing-down/comment-page-1/#comment-98942</link>
		<dc:creator>Gert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 16:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuds.org/2008/05/slowing-down/#comment-98942</guid>
		<description>But they don&#039;t offer discounts for people with hand luggage only (although that is quite difficult to achieve with the liquids rule, now!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they don&#8217;t offer discounts for people with hand luggage only (although that is quite difficult to achieve with the liquids rule, now!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skuds</title>
		<link>http://skuds.org/2008/05/slowing-down/comment-page-1/#comment-98899</link>
		<dc:creator>Skuds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 20:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuds.org/2008/05/slowing-down/#comment-98899</guid>
		<description>Ah.  So it was a BA fuel-saving tactic to leave all the luggage behind at terminal five when all the passengers took off. 

It all makes sense now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah.  So it was a BA fuel-saving tactic to leave all the luggage behind at terminal five when all the passengers took off. </p>
<p>It all makes sense now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skud's sister</title>
		<link>http://skuds.org/2008/05/slowing-down/comment-page-1/#comment-98890</link>
		<dc:creator>skud's sister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuds.org/2008/05/slowing-down/#comment-98890</guid>
		<description>It is also the reason why people get charged for excess baggage - it takes additional fuel to carry extra weight. Although this would also mean that most Americans should be charged double.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is also the reason why people get charged for excess baggage &#8211; it takes additional fuel to carry extra weight. Although this would also mean that most Americans should be charged double&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

