Masthead
One of my photos

Sikh as a parrot

June 25th, 2008 · Posted by Skuds in Politics · 1 Comment · Politics

I see from the local papers that the planning application to rebuild the Sikh temple in West Green was turned down.  I’m not surprised by this, but I’m a little disappointed.  I saw the plans while I was making a social visit to the temple this year and they looked like a vast improvement on the current building and I might have gone down to the town hall to support them, but I only heard about the meeting from a work colleague the next day.

Being realistic, I doubt if the new building would have gone ahead even if it did get permission, because of funding.  There hardly ever is the money for these buildings at this stage, of course.  Normally the granting of planning permission is the thing that kick-starts the fund-raising, and that doesn’t always reach its target before the permission expires – just look at the Hindu temple application for a good example of that.

While it is true that the site is not huge, and that there is a lot of traffic generated, that happens already. I think that the plans tried to address that as much as it is possible to, and would not have made it worse.   Quite why anyone would prefer a single-storey eyesore to decent-looking two-storey building I don’t know.

The best possible solution would be for the town’s two Sikh groups to work together and make the proposed Gossops Green temple suitable for both to share.  That would enable the Spencers Road site to be sold off to provide some funding for a new shared temple, but differences between the two groups have always made that a non-starter in the past.   The good news is that some of the younger members of both communities are starting to say the same thing, along with the more progressive older members.

They will have a hard job persuading the more conservative members of both groups, but at least the idea is being talked about.  The irony is that if they ever succeed in working together the residents of Spencer Road who got the application for a new temple building there turned down on grounds of being an over-development would probably end up with a three- or four-storey block of flats thereinstead.

Tags: ··

Spread the word!
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

One Comment so far ↓

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

 

 
Comments Policy:

  • Comments from anyone who is unknown (ie who has not commented before) will go into a moderation queue to be approved. This is to prevent spam/advertising comments and there may be a delay before such comments appear.
  • As far as possible I will not reject moderated comments or delete published comments, even if I disagree with them or if they are criticising me.
  • I intend only to delete/reject comments which are offensive, racist, homophobic, sexist or similar or if they are in any way illegal/libellous.
  • If you think a comment meets those criteria and I might have missed it, let me know.
  • Although technically I am able to edit comments I will not do so unless it is to remove embedded code which is causing problems.
  • If it is ever necessary to edit a comment it will be made clear that it has been edited.
  • Certain words in comments will cause the whole comment to be automatically consigned to the dustbin (Aavaisha, hmmegatest, cognitive, phentermine, xanax, pharmacy, viagra, vicodin, casino, ultram, tamiflu, valium, tramadol, levitra, carisoprodol) for obvious reasons.