Comments on: Expenses confusion http://skuds.org/2009/12/expenses-confusion/ "Please send me evenings and weekends" Mon, 21 May 2012 15:06:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Martin http://skuds.org/2009/12/expenses-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-100684 Martin Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:47:47 +0000 http://skuds.org/?p=4214#comment-100684 Skuds! you always were good at the maths, obviously the logic was lacking...lol, of course no claim is lower than any claim in value... because it does not exist...lol Hope your doing well my freind! Skuds! you always were good at the maths, obviously the logic was lacking…lol, of course no claim is lower than any claim in value… because it does not exist…lol Hope your doing well my freind!

]]> By: Skuds http://skuds.org/2009/12/expenses-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-100681 Skuds Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:51:25 +0000 http://skuds.org/?p=4214#comment-100681 Thanks PedantGeek! Thanks PedantGeek!

]]> By: PooterGeek http://skuds.org/2009/12/expenses-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-100677 PooterGeek Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:52:00 +0000 http://skuds.org/?p=4214#comment-100677 It's the lowest claim because Barlow (and perhaps others) didn't make one. That is, a claim has to exist before it can be described as "low". [I'm not happy about having to type "BROOKING" to have my comment accepted.] It’s the lowest claim because Barlow (and perhaps others) didn’t make one. That is, a claim has to exist before it can be described as “low”.

[I'm not happy about having to type "BROOKING" to have my comment accepted.]

]]>