<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paranoid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skuds.org/2009/12/paranoid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skuds.org/2009/12/paranoid/</link>
	<description>&#34;Please send me evenings and weekends&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:51:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danivon</title>
		<link>http://skuds.org/2009/12/paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-100712</link>
		<dc:creator>Danivon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuds.org/?p=4224#comment-100712</guid>
		<description>This was a very odd story. I check Duncan&#039;s blog every now and then, because each new post is unintentionally funnier than the previous one, and for some time I saw no change.

Then, one day, I saw the &quot;Argh! They&#039;re trying to silence me! With Internets!&quot; post. I did send a comment suggesting that I&#039;d seen nothing wrong with his blog, but suggesting that he may have a problem with his PC (and noting as you did, that the hosting is remote). 

Next time I looked that post had disappeared too - perhaps Duncan feeling a bit embarrassed (or maybe the might of the People&#039;s Revolutionary Army - Blogger Division struck again over the night?) . When I saw that it had been picked up by the Obby, it did give me a chortle.

But I have to agree with the point that Richard quoted. It&#039;s like being called &#039;smug&#039; by the Crow, or &#039;vacuous&#039; by Dave Cameron...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very odd story. I check Duncan&#8217;s blog every now and then, because each new post is unintentionally funnier than the previous one, and for some time I saw no change.</p>
<p>Then, one day, I saw the &#8220;Argh! They&#8217;re trying to silence me! With Internets!&#8221; post. I did send a comment suggesting that I&#8217;d seen nothing wrong with his blog, but suggesting that he may have a problem with his PC (and noting as you did, that the hosting is remote). </p>
<p>Next time I looked that post had disappeared too &#8211; perhaps Duncan feeling a bit embarrassed (or maybe the might of the People&#8217;s Revolutionary Army &#8211; Blogger Division struck again over the night?) . When I saw that it had been picked up by the Obby, it did give me a chortle.</p>
<p>But I have to agree with the point that Richard quoted. It&#8217;s like being called &#8217;smug&#8217; by the Crow, or &#8216;vacuous&#8217; by Dave Cameron&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skuds</title>
		<link>http://skuds.org/2009/12/paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-100709</link>
		<dc:creator>Skuds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuds.org/?p=4224#comment-100709</guid>
		<description>Richard - just because they &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; all out to get you it doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;re not paranoid ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard &#8211; just because they <b>are</b> all out to get you it doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re not paranoid <img src='http://skuds.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://skuds.org/2009/12/paranoid/comment-page-1/#comment-100707</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuds.org/?p=4224#comment-100707</guid>
		<description>Definition of a &quot;Skudderism&quot; (RWS Dictionary of Definitions - Page 19) :

&quot;An expression with the illusion of clear meaning, but in reality highly ambiguous&quot;

Example : &quot;I think that when Richard Symonds starts calling you paranoid you should start worrying&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definition of a &#8220;Skudderism&#8221; (RWS Dictionary of Definitions &#8211; Page 19) :</p>
<p>&#8220;An expression with the illusion of clear meaning, but in reality highly ambiguous&#8221;</p>
<p>Example : &#8220;I think that when Richard Symonds starts calling you paranoid you should start worrying&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
