<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the Loop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skuds.org/2010/03/in-the-loop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skuds.org/2010/03/in-the-loop/</link>
	<description>&#34;Please send me evenings and weekends&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiro</title>
		<link>http://skuds.org/2010/03/in-the-loop/comment-page-1/#comment-100971</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuds.org/?p=4564#comment-100971</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t bother with &quot;The Hurt Locker&quot; it&#039;s just one clichÃ© after another. Inglorious was far better and Avatar was far superior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t bother with &#8220;The Hurt Locker&#8221; it&#8217;s just one clichÃ© after another. Inglorious was far better and Avatar was far superior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danivon</title>
		<link>http://skuds.org/2010/03/in-the-loop/comment-page-1/#comment-100970</link>
		<dc:creator>Danivon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuds.org/?p=4564#comment-100970</guid>
		<description>Well, I liked it. I don&#039;t believe it&#039;s as accurate as that egotist Armando Ianucci claims, but it was pretty good considering how awful some TV-to-film conversions have been in the UK.

And Gandolfini was brilliant - especially at the end when you saw exactly how noble he was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I liked it. I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s as accurate as that egotist Armando Ianucci claims, but it was pretty good considering how awful some TV-to-film conversions have been in the UK.</p>
<p>And Gandolfini was brilliant &#8211; especially at the end when you saw exactly how noble he was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://skuds.org/2010/03/in-the-loop/comment-page-1/#comment-100965</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuds.org/?p=4564#comment-100965</guid>
		<description>I did the same thing - saw 5mins of The Thick of It once, but that&#039;s all. In The Loop made me laugh a few times too, but it was all pretty unpleasant - bit too cynical and insult-based for me, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the same thing &#8211; saw 5mins of The Thick of It once, but that&#8217;s all. In The Loop made me laugh a few times too, but it was all pretty unpleasant &#8211; bit too cynical and insult-based for me, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

