Masthead
One of my photos

Sign of the (County) Times

November 11th, 2011 · Posted by Skuds in Life · 1 Comment · Life

Eleven years into the 21st century (or ten depending on how pedantic you are) the West Sussex County Times has actually decided to think about moving into the 20th century. I have a track record of moaning about the ridulously large format of the WSCT and how impractical it is to read but I always imagined this was something that was not up for debate. Apparently it now it.

Not that they are definitely going to do it, but they are at least thinking about it and asking readers what they think. So far the poll on the website shows it to be a bit of a ‘marmite’ issue with 91% in favour of change, 9% against change and absolutely zero votes for “I’m not really fussed”.

That result surprised me at first. I had assumed that most readers actually liked the outdated format and in any case would take a conservative-with-a-small-c attitude of being against change on principle anyway. Then I rationalised it. I imagine that there actually is a large number of people against it almost by definition they won’t be voting in an online poll: they will make their feelings known by writing to the editor by hand, possibly even using goose-feeather quills to do so.

If it is decided to move to a tabloid format then the biggest impact would possibly not be in Horsham but in Crawley. If the County Times went tabloid then how likely would its clone, the Crawley Times remain broadsheets? And if the Crawley Times went tabloid then what would differentiate it from the Crawley Observer which appears a day or two earlier and has mostly the same content written by the same people?

Tags:

One Comment so far ↓

  • Richard

    If WSCT ‘downsizes’ to tabloid format, I predict the end of either ‘Snobby’ (Crawley Times) or ‘Obby’ (Crawley Observer).

    At a guess, ‘Snobby’ will disappear. It’s done its job – helped the Tories gain political control of Crawley by ousting Labour’s Laura Moffatt.

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

 

 
Comments Policy:

  • Comments from anyone who is unknown (ie who has not commented before) will go into a moderation queue to be approved. This is to prevent spam/advertising comments and there may be a delay before such comments appear.
  • As far as possible I will not reject moderated comments or delete published comments, even if I disagree with them or if they are criticising me.
  • I intend only to delete/reject comments which are offensive, racist, homophobic, sexist or similar or if they are in any way illegal/libellous.
  • If you think a comment meets those criteria and I might have missed it, let me know.
  • Although technically I am able to edit comments I will not do so unless it is to remove embedded code which is causing problems.
  • If it is ever necessary to edit a comment it will be made clear that it has been edited.
  • Certain words in comments will cause the whole comment to be automatically consigned to the dustbin (Aavaisha, hmmegatest, cognitive, phentermine, xanax, pharmacy, viagra, vicodin, casino, ultram, tamiflu, valium, tramadol, levitra, carisoprodol) for obvious reasons.