Today I had an e-mail from the “BNP IT Warfare Unit”. Actually I had 10 e-mails from them, all addressed to the Crawley UAF address.
In itself, 10 e-mails is not much of an annoyance, I get more than that from WordPress telling me of spam comments which need moderating (I have now turned off notification for that!) but there are a few interesting speculations about all this.
Firstly, are the BNP really trying to flood the mailboxes of those known to be against them, or is it a sympathiser acting on his own? Do they really think that 10 e-mails in a day is an effective DDOS attack? Nice job though – very well-spoofed headers, with all 10 mails purporting to come from 10 different spurious addresses in different countries, and 10 different x-reply-to addresses showing a sense of humour: addresses in the NHS, Merton council, John Prescott and South Wales police, for example.
I guess that much more prominent organisations like the Lancaster UAF are getting the same thing.
What a typical BNP-type name though… “Crusaders”, with its little nod to the anti-muslim crusades.
On the whole I am quite pleased to see that they have recognised the futility of attempting rational argument to back up their irrational views. I can only see the existance of an “IT Warfare Unit” as being an act of surrender rather than an act of aggression.
Ketlan // May 24, 2006 at 10:12 pm
Hi Skuds
Oddly enough, we haven’t received any of these yet – though I have heard of one poor sod who ended up with thousands of them. Still, spam-defender software up and running just in case!
I like your last comment – ‘I can only see the existance of an “IT Warfare Unit” as being an act of surrender rather than an act of aggression.’
So true.
Keep up the good work. 🙂
Regards
Ketlan
for Lancaster UAF
Richard W. Symonds // May 24, 2006 at 11:17 pm
Sadly, an Orwellesque “IT Warfare Unit” exists within the ‘Security Services’ of the ‘International Community’ (but it’s called by another name). It is aggressive, and shows no sign of surrendering…
Skuds // May 24, 2006 at 11:38 pm
Have you been on the receiving end then Richard?
Richard W. Symonds // May 25, 2006 at 5:23 am
‘Warning shots’ only – thus far.